My response to The Western Front "covering" a friend's vaping business:
It troubles me that every time The Western Front covers e-cigarettes, the anti-smoking hysteria of the late 20th-century creeps into every such article. Our society is so bent on keeping people from smoking that they will resort to scare tactics, emotional appeal, outdated and defunct studies, and pseudoscience to pursue their objective. With the advent of "vaping" or vaporizing, we are now witnessing the vilification of a smoking alternative we have yet to study in full. It is important to realize that e-cigarettes contain nicotine and other harmful substances, and have not been thoroughly examined in the scientific community, especially when concerning its long-term effects on users. However, people who vaporize and smoke should be able to do so while respecting those around them without their peers looking down on them. When The Western Front covered the Aslan Brewing Company this past February, there was no mention that alcohol can kill a person in one sitting, contribute to liver problems in the long-term, and is responsible for aggressive behavior and millions of violent crime each year. People should be able to do what they want to their own bodies, as long as they are not harming others. Everybody has a vice, whether it be drinking, smoking, or eating junk food. We all need to put this in perspective and stop trying to impede the rights of others.
More from me about e-cigarettes:
E-cig anxiety at WWU
Appreciating politics for the way it is - needlessly perplexing and full of hot air.
Popular Posts
-
Almost every day I go into work, I hear: "Can I borrow some latex?" The city where I have worked is pretty strict about how th...
-
"My child wants to grow up to be an influencer !" *queue smelling salts* "Nobody wants to work anymore, they just want to be ...
-
Whoaaaa, Book 3, Episode 9 of Korra - "The Stakeout" ...shit went down. I thought it would be ones of those episodes where no...
Showing posts with label e-cigs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-cigs. Show all posts
Sunday, July 27, 2014
Saturday, December 28, 2013
E-cig anxiety at WWU
I wrote a letter to the editor that got published in the Western Washington University school newspaper in response to one of their articles. However, my letter has yet to be posted online...even though it has been months, so I am putting it on here for the time being.
Thank you for publishing the article concerning E-cigarettes. I am serious when I say that I have never heard someone complain about other people using them, so I am not sure how the concern over E-cigarettes came to be. While I am glad to know that the school faculty and AS Board of Directors care for our well-being, I believe they need to hear out the student body before making any rash decisions concerning the change of the smoking policy to include E-cigarettes.
It is my opinion that more research needs to be done on E-Cigarettes before anyone can say that they are any more or less healthy than normal tobacco products.
I have a question for those considering changing the smoking policy to include E-cigarettes:
Do you want it changed because of concerns about secondhand vapor negatively affecting the health of third parties, or are you trying to look after the health of the individuals who choose to partake in vaporizing?
If it is the first reason, I am sure the student body would like to see the research concluding that secondhand vapor has that effect on people.
If it is the latter, why do you feel the need to tell students what they can or cannot do with their own bodies via regulation? If instead of changing the policy you started an educational campaign teaching students about E-cigarettes, it would allow them to make informed decisions of their own without limiting their personal freedoms.
The Director of Environmental Health and Safety sent me information on why they were considering these policy changes and I wrote this in reply:
After reading this link from the University of Kentucky, I still stick to my arguments, especially the one dealing with a person being able to choose what to do with his or her own body. I find it very inconclusive. It seems that the university is more concerned with using biased sources, emotional appeals, and scare tactics to try to convince people not to use or support the use of E-cigarettes. While it is true that they contain chemicals, even those that are considered carcinogenic, I would want to see more evidence that second vapor would actually negatively affect third parties.
It would also be worthwhile to mention that I was told the policy changes were in discussion because some students were vaporizing in the library and it caused the fire alarm to go off. Definitely not a knee-jerk reaction on the school's part. I will definitely be writing more about e-cigs in the future.
Thank you for publishing the article concerning E-cigarettes. I am serious when I say that I have never heard someone complain about other people using them, so I am not sure how the concern over E-cigarettes came to be. While I am glad to know that the school faculty and AS Board of Directors care for our well-being, I believe they need to hear out the student body before making any rash decisions concerning the change of the smoking policy to include E-cigarettes.
It is my opinion that more research needs to be done on E-Cigarettes before anyone can say that they are any more or less healthy than normal tobacco products.
I have a question for those considering changing the smoking policy to include E-cigarettes:
Do you want it changed because of concerns about secondhand vapor negatively affecting the health of third parties, or are you trying to look after the health of the individuals who choose to partake in vaporizing?
If it is the first reason, I am sure the student body would like to see the research concluding that secondhand vapor has that effect on people.
If it is the latter, why do you feel the need to tell students what they can or cannot do with their own bodies via regulation? If instead of changing the policy you started an educational campaign teaching students about E-cigarettes, it would allow them to make informed decisions of their own without limiting their personal freedoms.
The Director of Environmental Health and Safety sent me information on why they were considering these policy changes and I wrote this in reply:
After reading this link from the University of Kentucky, I still stick to my arguments, especially the one dealing with a person being able to choose what to do with his or her own body. I find it very inconclusive. It seems that the university is more concerned with using biased sources, emotional appeals, and scare tactics to try to convince people not to use or support the use of E-cigarettes. While it is true that they contain chemicals, even those that are considered carcinogenic, I would want to see more evidence that second vapor would actually negatively affect third parties.
It would also be worthwhile to mention that I was told the policy changes were in discussion because some students were vaporizing in the library and it caused the fire alarm to go off. Definitely not a knee-jerk reaction on the school's part. I will definitely be writing more about e-cigs in the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)